Visual Turn

  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything

“The watershed that demonstrated the Legion [of Decency]’s new commitment to mature works and forced the industry to abandon the [Production] Code was the most expensive non-spectacle film of its time, Warner Brothers’ Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? With the appropriately brash ‘screw you,’ Martha and George not only ushered in Nick and Honey but dispatched a whole era of film censorship.”


“The necessary changes included, among other things, the elimination of over twenty ‘goddamns,’ seven ‘bastards,’ five ‘sons-of-a-bitch,’ and assorted anatomical phrases such as ‘right ball,’ ‘monkey nipples,’ and ‘ass.’ The [Warner Bros.] studio was confident that [Edward] ‘Albee is sufficiently inventive and creative to substitute potent and pungent dialogue that could prove highly effective, even though possibly reducing somewhat the ‘shock’ impact of this highly regarded play.’ “

Leonard J. Leff (1980). A test of American censorship: Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Cinema Journal, 19(2), 41–45.
Leff cites Warner executive Steve Trillig in a letter to Albee’s agent regarding the necessary changes needed to the screenplay for it to pass the Production Code. The 1963 letter was found among 26 boxes of uncatalogued materials pertinent to Virginia Woolf in the Ernest Lehman Collection, Hoblitzelle Theatre Arts Library, Humanities Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin.
Goddamn, I love great scholarly research! —Visual Turn
View Separately

“The watershed that demonstrated the Legion [of Decency]’s new commitment to mature works and forced the industry to abandon the [Production] Code was the most expensive non-spectacle film of its time, Warner Brothers’ Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? With the appropriately brash ‘screw you,’ Martha and George not only ushered in Nick and Honey but dispatched a whole era of film censorship.”

“The necessary changes included, among other things, the elimination of over twenty ‘goddamns,’ seven ‘bastards,’ five ‘sons-of-a-bitch,’ and assorted anatomical phrases such as ‘right ball,’ ‘monkey nipples,’ and ‘ass.’ The [Warner Bros.] studio was confident that [Edward] ‘Albee is sufficiently inventive and creative to substitute potent and pungent dialogue that could prove highly effective, even though possibly reducing somewhat the ‘shock’ impact of this highly regarded play.’ “

Leonard J. Leff (1980). A test of American censorship: Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Cinema Journal, 19(2), 41–45.

Leff cites Warner executive Steve Trillig in a letter to Albee’s agent regarding the necessary changes needed to the screenplay for it to pass the Production Code. The 1963 letter was found among 26 boxes of uncatalogued materials pertinent to Virginia Woolf in the Ernest Lehman Collection, Hoblitzelle Theatre Arts Library, Humanities Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin.

Goddamn, I love great scholarly research!
—
Visual Turn

Source: jstor.org

    • #censorship
    • #cinema
    • #Virginia Woolf
    • #Elizabeth Taylor
    • #Hollywood
    • #scholarship
    • #academic writing
    • #research
    • #goddamn
  • 1 year ago
  • 1
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Portrait/Logo

Learning in a visual age.
  • visualturn.com/+

Following

Seen around Tumblr

  • Photo via urbanset

    Skull Made of Typewriter Parts by Jeremy Mayer

    Photo via urbanset
  • Photo via saidtotheuniverse

    Type City is a recent artwork by artist Hong Seon Jang that uses pieces of movable type from a printing press to create an elaborate...

    Photo via saidtotheuniverse
  • Photo via jonportfolio

    hamncheezr:

    How to Care for Introverts. THIS!

    Photo via jonportfolio
  • Photo via big-easy

    vadoom:

    “Spring Rain in the French Quarter”

    Photo via big-easy
See more →
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr